Skip to content

White House says Libyan conflict too limited to violate War Powers law

June 15, 2011

White House says Libyan conflict too limited to violate War Powers law

A bipartisan group of House lawmakers went to court Wednesday to try to stop President Obama’s troop deployment to Libya, but the White House submitted a report to Congress arguing it is adhering to the War Powers Resolution because it is not actually engaged in “hostilities.”

“U.S. operations do not involve sustained fighting or active exchanges of fire with hostile forces, nor do they involve the presence of U.S. ground troops, U.S. casualties or a serious threat thereof,” the administration said in a 32-page public report, which was sent to Congress along with a classified annex describing in more detail the rebels the U.S. is aiding.

Still, senior administration officials briefing reporters acknowledged that U.S. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles are making strikes in Libya, and said U.S. warplanes are still flying sorties and can respond if fired upon. Those actions would seem to test the limits of what is considered hostile action under the 1973 War Powers Resolution.

The report also gives a detailed look at spending on the conflict. Military spending totaled $715.9 million through June 3, of which more than half of that total is expended munitions. By Sept. 30, the end of the fiscal year, that will have grown to $1.1 billion, with another $50 million spent on munitions over the final four months.

Obama administration officials said those funds are being shifted from within the Defense Department and it doesn’t see a need to request emergency funds from Congress. Such a request would likely precipitate a major fight on Capitol Hill over whether the president should be allowed to continue the mission.

The State Department has spent an additional $3.7 million, and the government has committed nearly $81 million more toward humanitarian assistance.

Administration officials said they are not contesting the constitutionality of the War Powers Resolution, which places limits on the president’s ability to commit U.S. troops to fighting.

But Congress may see it differently.

On Tuesday House Speaker John A. Boehner, Ohio Republican, wrote a letter to Mr. Obama saying if he doesn’t withdraw troops or get Congress’s approval by Sunday, he could run afoul of the War Powers Resolution. And earlier this month the House passed a resolution setting a Friday deadline for the administration to provide detailed information on the extent and goals of its Libyan operations.

Mr. Obama approved U.S. strikes on Libya in March while on a trip to Latin America, saying Libyan regime leader Col. Moammar Gadhafi had threatened to show “no mercy” to those supporting the rebellion in the country’s east.

The strikes began March 19, and two days later the president sent notification to Congress of the action, complying with that part of the War Powers Resolution. Since then, the administration says it has conducted at least 30 briefings for congressional members and staff, which the White House said fulfills a duty to consult with Congress.

But lawmakers said the War Powers Resolution requires more than consultation, it requires an affirmative vote if the president wants to commit to military action for an extended period of time.

“The Constitution requires the president to ‘take care that the laws be faithfully executed,’ and one of those laws is the War Powers Resolution, which requires an approving action by Congress or withdrawal within 90 days from the notification of a military operation,” Mr. Boehner said in his letter to the president.

Sunday would be the 90th day since the U.S. first took action in Libya.

The House earlier this month passed a resolution that contained a veiled threat to cut off funding for the operation unless Mr. Obama provided extensive information.

U.S. voters hold conflicted views on U.S. involvement. A Fox News Poll taken last week found Americans oppose the mission by a nearly 2-to-1 ratio, and substantial majorities said Mr. Obama had not articulated a cogent reason for U.S. involvement.

Still, other polls show a majority of voters are comfortable with what the U.S. military is doing in Libya now, yet also want to see the coalition specifically target Col. Gadhafi.

Meanwhile, some members of Congress went to court Wednesday to try to force an end to U.S. action.

Rep. Dennis J. Kucinich, an Ohio Democrat who has carved out extensive anti-war credentials, led a group of two other Democrats and seven Republicans in the House in suing in federal court.

They are asking for an injunction to halt U.S. involvement in NATO’s operations, and want the court to weigh in on the broader issue of whether the president needs proactive congressional authorization to commit military forces.

“We believe that the law was violated. We have asked the courts to move to protect the American people from the results of these illegal policies,” said Rep. Dennis J. Kucinich, an Ohio Democrat who is leading the lawsuit.

The complaint names both Mr. Obama and Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates

The Washington Times, LLC
Click Here for Original Story


From → Uncategorized

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: